Friday, November 20, 2009

White Sands Wonder.
































































































































































































































































































































































In my travels thou out this great state I am easily captivated by it's beauty. One of the places I love to travel to is White Sands N.M. One of the things that has made me and countless many happy over the years is that the world has finally sat up and taken notice of N.M., especially White Sands National Monument. Although I believe Transformes might have been shot at White Sands Missile Range it's close enough to the national monument that one can easily see the same type of desert that appears in both the Transformers movies.
Even if your not a film buff White Sands N.M. still will provide the naked eye with plenty of appeal, especially around sunset. At any time of the day one can see children sledding down a dune or a photographer setting up that one great shot that he or she can show to their family and friends. The neighboring city of Alamagordo is also a must see for it's Natural Space History Museum and IMAX Planatarium. The town is friendly and while Richard Branson wants to build the International Space Port near Las Crusas N.M. one can easily see that's because Alamagordo doesn't need the extra publicity. That's because the film industries and the military base nearby Alamagordo is already a hot spot. If you ever catch yourself wanting to see one of the world's natural wonders or you just find yourself wanting to see what tomorrow's technology will hold just visit this part of N.M. Las Crusas is only a half hour drive from Alamagordo. If you have the time also rent a cabin in Cloudcroft and drive down the neighboring mountain into Alamagordo, the scenery is second to none.

Monday, November 9, 2009

Ghost or Time

There has been alot of buzz pertaining to the Birdcage here in New Mexico. Is it really haunted? The paranormal investigators known simply as TAPS seems to believe it is. Now I really respect and somewhat admire this organization. However when investigating the paranormal I believe one must be able to disprove the known science first before being able to call something paranormal. Whether it be a place or an entity.
In Science there are events known as time rifts. Imagine if you will that time is a straight line and for whatever reason time loses it's ability to be able to keep the line pulled tight, if only momentarily, what would be created is a temporary gap thus allowing the present to see the past. Further imagine if you will a woman sitting on her porch who suddenly upon looking in her backyard sees a group of little girls jumping rope and laughing. As she gets out of her chair to investigate the group of girls disappear. Did she really see the girls or did she see ghost? Perhaps neither. Perhaps she saw a moment of these girls past and as she went to investigate time pulled the line straight making the image disappear. While I do believe in the supernatural all possibilities must be considered. Another possibility is what's known as echoes. If the house or land has the ability of projecting memories then the actual spiritual entities ,those girls, are not a factor, the house or land just my be projecting images and even sound to relay the overall disposition of it's last owners or events. If the woman actually investigates all the previous owners she may come to find that one or more of the girls she saw are actually alive, thus disproving that what she witnessed was ghost. Investigation is vital. I guess all one can do is watch out for cold spots and take EMF readings. Also check the history of what your investigating. Above all consider all possibilities.

Monday, November 2, 2009

APD Friend or foe?

Recently I received an email from a friend who had an interesting story to tell me. Apparently one night he was on his way to his workplace located on Central Ave here in Albuquerque and decided on his way back home to cut down Central to Wyoming Blvd. to go to the Hastings on Wyoming and Montgomery. Frustrated with the music on the radio he decide to reach inside his glove box for a CD. He said his glove box was a mess and decide it would be safer to pull onto a side street and park to find the CD he was searching for. In under a minute an APD patrol vehicle pulled up behind him with it's lights flashing and spotlight on. When the officer approached him he asked him for his licence ad insurance, which is standard. After the officer was provided with this information he asked why my friend was in the area. My friend replied that he had pulled over to find a CD. The officer then replied that he had been on the force for several years and didn't believe him. The officer then went on to say that there are only two reasons why people come to this section of town and that was to score drugs or women. Feeling offended my friend said that he was doing neither, just looking for a CD. I stopped my friend almost mid sentence and told him that the area was crime ridden and the officer was probably just following through on his suspicions. Not my wisest move, especially since he followed up my statement by saying that the office then gave him a field sobriety test. I asked him if h had been drinking and he said no, he hadn't given the officer any reason to assume that he had been drinking. After passing the unnecessary sobriety test my friend said that the officer now was considering checking him for warrants. At this point my already frustrated friend told the officer to do what he wanted he's clean and reminded the officer that he a just looking for a CD. The officer didn't run his background, but instead told him to leave the area and never return. Which will be hard for my friend to do seeing as he works in the area.
Look I can understand that APD has a tough job to do, especially in that area of town, but they do not have the right to suggest that someone may be doing something illegal just because they pull over on a side street irregardless of the reason. I still can't figure out why my friend was given a sobriety test, who know maybe there was a reason, however to tell my friend he was no longer allowed to drive on that particular part of town was wrong. The taxpayers own those streets not APD. I usually support APD, but in this particular case APD was at fault. My opinion of course.